Following the previous “ Aggression in a good balance of smallness and fulfillment performance '', this time Nikon's APS-C mirrorless “ Z 50 '' which Ochiai photographer evaluated as “ the camera that had the most personal impact in 2019 '' ]Had a rich review. Ochiai is a photographer who appreciates the large and easy-to-view EVF and the cheapness in appearance, but the descriptive performance of the first-class kit lens. However, there seems to be something to say in the specifications around the sensor.
"Sensor garbage" ran to buy two
I just bought two [?] I bought two, but actually I did not buy two from the beginning, first got a double zoom kit on the release date, and added another body about one month later It was the flow of doing. From the time I first used it to write an in-press article, I was vaguely thinking that "I might want two Z 50s. To keep the kit lens on each!" However, I really had a hesitation in stepping into a world where the public could say that it wasn't that kind of thing.
Nevertheless, the reason I finally got my hands on the second one was because I came to think "I want to change lenses on the go" right after I started using it. He noticed that the dust on the sensor was more noticeable than expected. Z6 and Z7 were not bothered by garbage. However, as I use it, I have to be conscious of the fact that there are many reflections of dust. I personally recognize this as the biggest weakness of the Z 50. If you do not narrow it down, you will not notice it, but once you notice it, you will see more and more of the garbage on the sensor. I also feel like the Z 50 doesn't have a dust removal function.
I also wanted camera shake correction inside the body
Also, I really want camera shake correction inside the body [VR inside the body]. This was something I knew from the beginning, but … Currently, there is no problem because the existing Z DX lens [kit lens] is equipped with VR. The problem is when trying to use a full size [FX] lens with the Z50. In fact, since I got the Watashi and Z 50, I wanted to try using "NIKKOR Z 14-30mm f / 4 S" with Z 50. It was hoped that the luxury of using only the center part of the S-line lens in addition to Oisy in terms of angle of view [equivalent to 21-45mm in 35mm format conversion] would be added to the picture, When I actually tried it, I was surely able to get a wonderful finish image quality and a sense of immorality that I could not say and grin. … And it was good so far. The problem is then.
It turned out that he was struck by micro-blurs far more often than he had imagined, and he fell into Zudong. The reason why the "photographing posture with camera shake correction", which he was fully aware of in places he did not notice, was mass-producing subtle camera shake cuts. Despite using wide zoom. No, this was a shock. I wonder if I was a blurred man so far. It's obviously my personal responsibility to shake the photos I don't want to shake. I have to admit losing.
Only the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f / 2.8 VR S, which has been postponed until now, will be equipped with a VR in the FX format NIKKOR Z. Going forward, lenses with shorter focal lengths may not be available. Over time, the VR-equipped Z DX will gradually become richer … Do you endure until then, or do you feel frustrated by the appearance of a Z70 with VR inside the body before that …? I don't know if you only open the lid for this.
APS-C mirrorless honorable work with good overall balance
On the other hand, it is also a point that the poor response when the EVF starts up [starts operating] in conjunction with the eye sensor. I wonder if the default setting to automatically switch between the monitor and the EVF is bad, even if it works only for the EVF, the eye sensor does not stubbornly quit the job, and the EVF turns off when the face separates from the eyepiece . Thanks to this, the next time you look through the viewfinder, you will be able to enjoy the same time lag as when switching between the EVF and the rear monitor automatically. When shooting moving objects, this dullness is quite awkward.
However, AF tracking of moving objects is as responsive as higher-end models [automatic area AF has the same tendency for the AF points to be small …], and AE / AF tracking is the fastest at 11 frames / sec. Continuous shooting is possible [however, RAW is recorded in 12 bits and the viewfinder display during continuous shooting is an after-view flip-flop cartoon …] Above all, the two kit lenses are shot well, so the system is completed with just that It is not impossible to make it possible [constructing a system with a total weight of 2 kg or less including two bodies].
I feel that the Z50 is a well-balanced, high-level product that is easy to understand, easy to use, has a good mood when used, and has a finished image quality that is not inferior to high-end models. As mentioned above, the Z 50 has the strength to turn those avatars into ecbos, though there are certain aspects and concerns.
As I recall, I have been happily using the D40 and D40X at the same time, and the past that favored the D5000 series … No, this is not the story of the past, but now I'm cleaning up my SLR The story is that there is a base that owns D5500. In other words, I originally liked "the camera in a position like the Z50". But even without that, I think the Z APS-C model is "per". I hope Nikon "Z" will roll more and more in this direction.
"I received a request for a manuscript under the theme of XX," "I'm going to interview XX this time …", "If you don't own and use it, you can't do it!" Such as, Ikuseki Frost continues to line up myself to buy a new camera and lens. Suddenly, I noticed that I was being fooled by myself, but that was just Tadashi's B-type Taurus, who continues to be fooled today. 2020 Camera Grand Prix external selection committee member.