Point out that “ terrible check '' in dissertation is hindering scientific development
In some journals, other scientists will check for upcoming papersRefereeingThere is a system called. It is often said that peer reviewers are responsible for maintaining a certain level of quality and accuracy in published papers, but “ some reviewers write very bad peer review comments. '' And of science journalsScienceNoted science writer Christie Wilcox who contributed the article to.
Rude paper reviews are pervasive and sometimes harmful, study finds | Science | AAAS
Biologists Nissa Sibirger and Amber Stavler are peer-reviewed scientific journals.PeerJWas posted onpaper"By" problematic peer review,STEMThe productivity and career of scientists working in the field are undermined. " Sybirger and colleagues conducted an anonymous questionnaire on 1106 scientists active in 14 fields, asking them for their peer review. As a result, 642 people, or 58% of the total, answered that they had been peer-reviewed by outside Chinese scientists. In addition, more than half of those who have undergone such peer review have replied, "I have received problematic peer review comments multiple times."
She also points out that problematic peer review comments often end up in personal attacks and lack constructive content. For example, one scientist who cooperated with a questionnaire commented, “When writing a review comment,Lipstick on pigAnd[Fucking bullshit brainI struggled to avoid using the word "." Another scientist has received a message saying, "I didn't look through because my last name seemed to be Spanish-speaking and I found it to be written in poor English." I answered.
Of the scientists who received problematic peer review comments, many of the white male scientists said they were "less affected." On the other hand, womenX gender-Colored scientists were more likely to report that "non-professional peer review has spurred emotions of self-doubt and impaired scientific productivity." Many colored scientists also felt that problematic peer review was slowing their career progression. "The scientists of all nationalities, of all genders and ethnicities, received uniformly problematic peer review comments, but the consequences were not uniform," Sybirger said.
Psychologist Dennis Sekapuaptewa of the University of Michigan Ann Arbor is a science news siteScienceInsider“ Basically, women and people of color are exposed to stereotypes that lack intelligence and scientific thinking. No matter how inaccurate the content is, it can be psychologically painful, and can have the consequences of self-suspicion, poor performance, and slow career growth. "
There are various opinions on these peer-review issues. Linda Beaumont, a climatologist at Macquarie University in Australia, argued that the problematic peer review should be a "different form of bullying" and that peer review comments be published. Others have suggested that peer reviewers should disclose their information, rather than peer review comments, so that the review is not anonymous. "Identifying the reviewers can lead to criminal dissatisfaction with senior scientists, which could lead to reprisals," said Adriana Romero Olivares, a microbiological ecologist at the University of New Hampshire. Romero Olivares said that instead of opening up peer reviewers,Double blindWe suggest that you introduce. If the authors and reviewers do not know each other and conduct the review in a double-blind manner, the peer review will not be affected by the attributes of the authors of the paper and the reviewers will not be retaliated.
Wilcox said, "Thoroughly dissolve the dissertation.Reviewer 2There is a joke, but the serious negative consequences of a bad reviewer are not a joke. "