World leaders point out that climate change has become a long-term risk over conflict and weapons of mass destruction
by Li-An Lim
An international organization working to improve the world situationWorld Economic ForumIn the 2020 edition of the Crowellhall Risk Report, it was pointed out that the "serious threat of climate change" is a long-term risk that outweighs cyberattacks, conflicts, and weapons of mass destruction.
Flaming Planet: The Flames of Climate Change and the Spread of Political Conflicts-Planets at the Limit: The Challenge of Climate Change and the Raging of Political Conflicts>> Media | World Economic Forum
Climate threats now dominate long-term risks, survey of global leaders finds
The World Economic Forum is an organization whose goal is to bring together leaders in economics, politics, academics and other societies to improve the world situation.DavosThe annual meeting of the Davos Conference, held in January every year, is well known. The 2020 Davos Conference will take place from January 21-24, including US President Trump and German Chancellor Merkel.Nearly 3,000 people from every field participateIt's a schedule.
Prior to the 2020 Davos meeting, the World Economic Forum published its annual report, the Global Risks Report, on January 15. We published a survey that asked more than 750 experts and decision makers around the world about the short-term risks expected to increase in 2020. The survey found that 78% said that "economic conflict" and "polarization of domestic politics" would increase.
The World Economic Forum is also investigating long-term risks that are likely to arise over the next decade. Summarizing the responses, the top five projected risks were all related to environmental issues. These are the top five risks for the next 10 years, as predicted by leaders and experts in various fields.
・ 1: Property, infrastructure and loss of life due to extreme weather
・ 2: Failure of governments and businesses to mitigate and adapt to climate change
・ 3: Man-made environmental pollution or disaster such as oil spill or radioactive contamination
• 4: Massive biodiversity loss and destruction causes irreversible damage to the environment, depleting significant resources for humans and industry
・ 5: Giant natural disasters such as earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanic eruptions, and magnetic storms
"This is a new result we didn't see last year," said Mirek Dusek, vice chair of the Center for Geopolitics and Regional Affairs at the World Economic Forum. It is the first time that environmental problems have been regarded as dangerous so far since the start of the investigation, and it is said that environmental problems are now more threatening than conflict and weapons of mass destruction.
The change is the result of difficulties in stopping global climate change and the potential negative effects of climate change, despite governments and businesses working to stop it.Thomson Reuters FoundationThe news release states:
A major insurance group in the United StatesMarsh and McLennanJohn Drzik, Head of Global Risk and Digital, said, “ All indicators are getting worse, '' said Wildfires in Australia, the Amazon and California, and floods and droughts around the world. Shows. " Dr Zik said that while environmental protection has increased pressure on governments and businesses, barriers such as political polarization and closed domestic conditions have made it more difficult to tackle climate change.
In addition, businesses are facing more than just the direct negative consequences of extreme weather. Drzik argues that indirect risks, such as increased regulation due to increased enthusiasm for protection and lawsuits by consumers and environmental groups, are also threatening.
"The cost of taking no action is far greater than the cost of taking action," said Norwegian politician Børge Brende, chair of the World Economic Forum.Zurich Insurance“ The slower we tackle climate change, the more painful the transition will be, '' said Peter Giger, chief risk officer for He said that we should work.